A Friend They Can’t Say No To

TL;DR

Prime Big Deal Days · Oct 6–7Offer from Amazon

Get gifts for the two of you delivered free — and shop member deals

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

The Gottman Institute’s report “A Friend They Can’t Say No To” outlines five ways parents can help teenagers respond to peer pressure, using the example of a ride with an unlicensed driver. It draws on research about peer influence and parent-teen communication, while recommending practical conversations and refusal practice rather than focusing only on punishment.

The Gottman Institute has published a guide called “A Friend They Can’t Say No To”, advising parents to help teenagers prepare for peer pressure rather than simply tell them to avoid a friend. Its central example is a teenager being offered a ride by an unlicensed driver, a situation in which safety concerns can collide with the fear of being laughed at or left out.

The report sets out five approaches: talk about the specific behavior that worries a parent; ask what it might cost a teenager socially to refuse; rehearse ways to resist pressure; listen when a teenager shares what happened; and help them build other friendships. The guidance distinguishes between setting a firm safety limit and asking a teenager to condemn someone they care about. A parent can say that riding with an unlicensed driver is not acceptable without turning the conversation into an attack on the friend.

To make the discussion useful, the report suggests asking what the friends encourage one another to do and how they respond when someone disagrees. If a teenager worries that refusal will lead to teasing or exclusion, that concern can be addressed directly. Parents and teenagers can practice words the teenager might actually use, such as “No, I’m not getting in,” and plan how to leave and get home, including who to call.

The advice also covers what happens after a risky choice. If a teenager admits getting into the car, the report recommends hearing their account before deciding how to respond. Parents can recognize the difficulty of the social situation while still addressing the decision. The guide also suggests supporting activities and friendships that give teenagers more social options, and making home a place where disagreement does not threaten their sense of belonging.

Making Refusal Safer to Practice

The report’s practical point is that knowing a rule and acting on it under social pressure are not always the same thing. A teenager may understand that a ride with an unlicensed driver is unsafe, yet find it hard to refuse when friends are insisting or when exclusion feels like the likely cost. Treating the issue only as disobedience may miss that pressure; treating the social risk as real gives parents a more specific problem to help solve.

Rehearsing a refusal and planning a safe way home can give a teenager options before a stressful moment arrives. Listening after an incident may also make it easier for a young person to explain what happened, allowing a parent to respond to both the safety decision and the circumstances around it. The report does not claim these steps guarantee a particular outcome; it presents them as ways to support decision-making and keep communication open.

The emphasis on other friendships matters for the same reason. If a teenager has more than one source of companionship, stepping back from a particular friendship may feel less like losing all social support. The guide frames this as part of learning to disagree with people whose approval matters while still expecting respect.

Research Behind the Advice

The Gottman Institute supports its recommendations with findings from studies of peer behavior, resistance to peer influence and parent-teen communication. The report describes research by psychologist Thomas Dishion and colleagues involving conversations between 186 boys aged 13 to 14 and their friends. It says that rule-breaking talk followed by laughter predicted increased self-reported rule-breaking over the following two years. The researchers called the pattern “deviancy training.” The finding concerns a group of boys and a specific study; it should not be read as proof that every joking or approving exchange leads to rule-breaking.

The report also cites Laurence Steinberg and Kathryn Monahan, who studied more than 3,600 people. According to the source, self-reported resistance to peer influence increased particularly between ages 14 and 18. That research is used to explain why parents may need to practice refusal with teenagers rather than assume they can reliably act against a group’s wishes in the moment.

For communication, the article refers to a study by Håkan Stattin and Margaret Kerr of 703 Swedish 14-year-olds and their parents. It says parents learned about teenagers’ activities mainly through what the teenagers voluntarily told them. The report uses that finding to support listening when a teenager chooses to disclose an incident, rather than beginning with a response that could close down the conversation.

““No, I’m not getting in.””

— The Gottman Institute report

Limits of the Evidence Cited

The source presents recommendations and summarizes earlier studies; it does not report a new trial testing whether the five approaches prevent risky decisions. It also does not give full study details, such as publication dates or the measures used, so the findings here are limited to the summaries provided by the institute. The study groups described are specific, including boys aged 13 to 14 in one study and Swedish 14-year-olds in another.

The report does not say how common rides with unlicensed drivers are, quantify how often the suggested conversations change behavior, or establish that any one approach works for every teenager. It is guidance for parents, not a guarantee of safety. The article also does not set out what a family should do in every immediate danger scenario; its example focuses on discussion, refusal practice and arranging a way home.

Putting the Advice Into Practice

The report’s next steps are actions families can take before a difficult invitation: discuss the behavior rather than label the friend, ask what makes refusal hard, rehearse a direct response, and agree on a way to leave or call for help. Parents can also support activities and relationships that broaden a teenager’s social circle. If an incident has already happened, the guide recommends first hearing what the teenager says, then addressing the safety decision and the family’s limits.

The Gottman Institute points readers seeking more support toward its Gottman Parenting: Teen Success program. The source does not announce a new study, policy change or follow-up date, so any further development beyond the published guidance is not specified.

Key Questions

What is “A Friend They Can’t Say No To” about?

It is a Gottman Institute guide to helping parents talk with teenagers about peer pressure. Its main example is a teenager considering a ride from a friend who does not have a license.

What does the report recommend parents do?

It recommends discussing the concerning behavior, asking what makes refusal socially difficult, practicing a response, listening if the teenager shares what happened, and supporting other friendships and activities.

Does the report say teenagers should end a friendship that involves pressure?

No. The guidance focuses on the behavior and how friends respond to disagreement. It suggests building other friendships so a teenager has more options, but does not prescribe ending a particular friendship.

What research does the article cite?

The report summarizes studies on peer conversations and later self-reported rule-breaking, resistance to peer influence among more than 3,600 people, and how parents learn about teenagers’ activities. It does not present a new study testing its recommendations.

Does practicing a refusal guarantee a teenager will avoid risky choices?

No. The report offers practice and planning as ways to prepare for peer pressure, but it does not claim that these steps guarantee a particular outcome.

Source: rss