TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Spain’s high court has acquitted singer Shakira of tax fraud after an eight-year case, ruling that she did not spend enough time in the country to be liable for taxes. The court ordered the treasury to reimburse her €64 million, with interest, but the tax agency plans to appeal. The ruling marks a significant legal victory for Shakira.
Spain’s high court has acquitted Colombian singer Shakira of tax fraud, ordering the country’s treasury to reimburse her approximately €64 million in taxes and penalties after an eight-year legal battle.
The court found that tax authorities failed to prove Shakira had spent at least 183 days in Spain in 2011, a key requirement for residency and tax liability. Instead, the court determined she had spent only 163 days in the country during that year, rendering her not liable for the charges.
The Spanish tax agency stated it would appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court and would not make any payment until the final decision. The court’s decision effectively clears Shakira of the allegations of tax evasion, which she has denied throughout the process.
Why It Matters
This ruling is a legal victory for Shakira, ending an eight-year ordeal that had significant personal and professional repercussions. It also sets a precedent regarding residency and tax liability in Spain, potentially influencing future cases involving foreign celebrities and residents.
For the public, the case highlighted issues of legal fairness and the burden of proof in tax disputes, especially involving high-profile individuals. The decision may impact how tax authorities pursue similar cases in the future.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
In 2018, Spanish authorities accused Shakira of failing to pay €14.5 million in taxes, alleging she was a resident for tax purposes in Spain from 2012 to 2014. The case drew extensive media attention and public scrutiny, with the singer maintaining her innocence and asserting she was not a resident during those years.
The legal process included multiple hearings, with Shakira’s legal team arguing that her time in Spain did not meet the residency threshold. The case was closely watched as a test of legal standards for residency and tax obligations for foreign nationals in Spain.
“After more than eight years of enduring brutal public targeting, orchestrated campaigns to destroy my reputation, and sleepless nights that ultimately impacted my health and my family’s well-being, the National High Court has finally set the record straight.”
— Shakira
“There was never any fraud, and the Administration itself could never prove otherwise, simply because it wasn’t true.”
— Shakira
“My greatest wish is that this ruling sets a precedent for the Treasury and serves the thousands of ordinary citizens who are abused and crushed every day by a system that presumes their guilt and forces them to prove their innocence.”
— Shakira
“We will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court and will not make any payments until the final ruling.”
— Spanish tax agency
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear when the Spanish Supreme Court will rule on the appeal, and whether the treasury will be required to reimburse Shakira immediately or after the final decision. The outcome of the appeal could alter the current ruling.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
The Spanish tax agency is expected to submit its appeal to the Supreme Court within the coming weeks. The final resolution of the case will depend on that court’s decision, which could take several months or longer.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Will Shakira receive the €64 million refund immediately?
Not necessarily. The treasury has stated it will not make any payment until the Supreme Court rules on the appeal, which may take additional time.
What was the main reason for the court’s acquittal?
The court found that the tax authorities failed to prove Shakira spent at least 183 days in Spain in 2011, which is required to establish residency for tax purposes. She was determined to have spent only 163 days that year.
Could the case be reopened if the appeal is unsuccessful?
If the Supreme Court upholds the appeal and rules against Shakira, the case could potentially be reopened, but that would depend on the specific legal grounds of the ruling.
How does this ruling affect her career?
The ruling clears her of legal charges related to this case, allowing her to focus on her career and upcoming projects without the burden of legal uncertainty.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
